“Look, I just want to write about this in a way that honors what you’ve done over the past two years.  I’ve never been present at the birth of anything remotely this important.  It deserves to be described well.” (Doctorow 114)

“You’ve been amazing, Suzanne.  We couldn’t have done it without you.  No one could have described it better.  Great deeds are irrelevant if no one knows about them or remembers them.” (Doctorow 114)

Suzanne questioning how to properly write about things, and Kettlewell’s response makes me wonder what “great deeds” could be going undiscovered in the CAL.  I make my way around the room and the most interesting things I hear are not about people’s work.  Why am I more interested in critiques of Tinkercad and how we are able to use it?  Perhaps I need to pay attention to the things that don’t grab my attention.  Could I be missing something similarly to how Suzanne missed Kodacell failing?