“The extent of mutual comprehension can only be ascertained through social constructs of tests and consensus” (Johnson, Body Movements).

 “He had the work and the people, and who needed anything more?” (Doctorow, 230)

Can comprehensive group learning ultimately be attained through the use of a single strategy relative to cognitive teaching and instruction?

Is the concept of structured isolated learning rendered completely useless in the process of acquiring a more critical understanding of a problem or social occurrence?

The classroom experience in relationship with a pursuit and yearning for more knowledge, can sometimes be subjected to disengagement and motivationally draining requirements within a group setting. As the current state of the U.S education system is in rapid decline it is becoming harder than ever before to promote anti-assimilation towards pre-imposed cultural settings operating within the atmosphere of a modern classroom. I find it very problematic however, to justify a unified commitment to a single directing structure for taught curriculum. Are the constructs of social interaction beneficial to the creative thought process, or can embracing isolation and the process of thoughtless obedience be just as important  to the developing mind? Are classroom “distractions” really justified as distractions at all when referring to subtle changes is physical positioning?