by Peter Bohmer<\/p>\n
In the short-run, it is very likely that a total financial collapse has been averted and that the free fall in the United States of Gross Domestic Production (GDP) and employment has come to an end.\u00a0 There will probably be an increase in GDP for the third quarter, 2009 and most mainstream economists and the media will say that the recession is over. This will be true in the way that recession is officially defined. However, in the more important sense of people\u2019s economic lives, employment \u00a0is likely to continue falling or increase at a rate slower than the increase in population meaning that unemployment, measured and unmeasured, is likely to continue growing. Given the high rates of unemployment and underemployment and the lack of bargaining power of workers, real wages are likely to continue to fall as are employee benefits. Given the continued budget deficits of most States and cities, public employees are also facing a future in the short run of no wage increases.\u00a0 Public services will continue to deteriorate.\u00a0 Housing foreclosures are likely to continue at a high rate. Poverty and unemployment will remain high. As Barbara Ehrenreich and Dedrick Muhammad, pointed out in the New York Times, Sunday, September 13th<\/sup>,<\/em> depression like conditions have been created in the Black community in the last two years and are likely to persist. In communities,\u00a0 based on manufacturing and construction there has also been an economic depression with no relief in sight.<\/p>\n The 2009 stimulus package of the Obama Administration although smaller than desirable and somewhat misdirected has had a positive effect in stimulating output and employment and in averting a full-scale economic depression. The other part of economic policy that begun under Bush and has been continued by the Obama administration has been the injection of huge infusions of money into failing banks, and financial institutions such as AIG, Citibank and Fannie Mae. Without these infusions, these institutions would have gone bankrupt. However, far cheaper and more economically just policies such as direct mortgage relief to homeowners, and nationalizing financial institutions with the purpose of providing credit to support people in need and desirable investment by businesses and cooperatives and public investment were not considered. This is because of the power of Wall Street and the extreme capitalist ideology of the Democrats and Republicans.<\/p>\n A generalized economic depression has been averted in the short run but with the likelihood that another and possibly even more severe financial collapse and recession\/depression is \u00a0likely to reoccur in the not too distant future. \u00a0The necessary structural changes in the economy and significant financial regulation that would provide some economic stability and reduced financial speculation are increasingly unlikely.<\/p>\n There are different structures of accumulation that shape capitalist development. The\u00a0 social structure of accumulation of the U.S. economy and the global economy for the last 30 years has been a neoliberal one, marked by growing inequality of income and wealth, privatization, deregulation of corporations and finance within and between borders, \u00a0and the dominance of financial capital. The financial bubble and near collapse were the non-surprising outcomes of this financialization.<\/p>\n A new social structure of accumulation\u00a0 has been promoted by liberal economists such as Robert Reich, Jamie Galbraith, Paul Krugman and Joseph Stiglitz.\u00a0 It would incorporate much tighter regulation of finance, universal health care, massive public investment in rail, mass transit, green technology, public subsidies for the develop of alternatives to oil based energy systems, some increases in taxes on the wealthy and restrictions on executive income, and \u00a0increased public spending for education and for reducing poverty. It is what Van Jones in his book, Green Collar Economy<\/em>, has called a Green New Deal.\u00a0 This would still be capitalism and would not end exploitation and poverty, militarism and imperialism, nor environmental destruction and alienation. We would still need to replace it.\u00a0 It would not end economic depressions and the business cycle. However, this Green New Deal would reduce the probability of another even worse financial collapse and severe economic recession\/depression in the next few years. While clearly being insufficient for economic and social and environmental justice, it would provide a social structure of accumulation for reducing unemployment and inequality.<\/p>\n The conditions for a future financial bubble and collapse have not been altered. \u00a0Wall Street has not been restrained. It is highly unlikely that even in the midst of the worst recession\/depression since the 1930\u2019s that financial derivatives and the casino economy will be meaningfully regulated. The economic system is still very fragile and highly leveraged with debt. Although unlikely in the immediate future, the financial system could unravel if the market for securities in commercial mortgages or another type of securitized asset (bond) collapses. \u00a0The top 10% of the population now have an income equal to the bottom 90% of the population; the 13,000 households with the highest incomes have an income equal to the 40 million with the lowest incomes. (Left Business Observer<\/em>, #120). Besides this inequality being obscene, it means that the majority will continue to \u00a0go increasingly into debt to buy what they need. Consumer debt will grow.<\/p>\n The so-called economic recovery we will increasingly be hearing about will be a jobless recovery. Employment will\u00a0 start growing no later than summer, 2010 but unemployment and particularly underemployment will stay high. Unless wages grow significantly which will not happen unless there is a huge growth in the militancy and strength of the labor movement, consumption spending will restrained, limiting the growth of employment. \u00a0Manufacturing will continue to decline and the quality of life for the majority and global warming will worsen unless we rise up and organize and revolt.<\/p>\n The possibility of growing social movements is real and hopeful. The Obama Presidential campaign has led to an increased interest, especially by young people and Black people in public affairs and social change. \u00a0The gloss of Obama\u2019s victory is wearing off. The U.S. occupation of Afghanistan is increasingly unpopular at home. \u00a0So is the frustration and anger at the absence of meaningful healthcare reform. The limitations of what President Obama can or wants to do are becoming more apparent every day.<\/p>\n Just like the expectations raised by John Kennedy and the limitations of the reforms he proposed spurred massive activism in the 1960\u2019s, this can happen again now. Let us build and connect movements and issues as we organize and struggle for significant and meaningful reforms and revolution.<\/p>\n Don’t Mourn, Organize!<\/p>\n Si Se Puede!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" by Peter Bohmer In the short-run, it is very likely that a total financial collapse has been averted and that the free fall in the United States of Gross Domestic Production (GDP) and employment has come to an end.\u00a0 There will probably be an increase in GDP for the third quarter, 2009 and most mainstream … Continue reading Reflection on the U.S. Economy, September 2009<\/span>