In Search of Lost Time

The Evergreen State College

Author: rhogab28

The Lived Experiences of a Black Woman: Part Three

I don’t remember how old I was, maybe I was eleven. Maybe older, but I was young. I was walking home from middle school and it was spring time, the walk home wasn’t that far but I hadn’t eaten all day and I needed something to drink. There was a fast food restaurant that everyone thought had shut down but just had bad business right at the bottom of the hill I lived on. I knew it wouldn’t be a good idea to walk up a three block hill so dehydrated and walked into the restaurant. I’m sure I got food, I was a growing girl, and I sat down to think about whatever boy problems I was having at that age without the interruption of my everyday life. There wasn’t anyone in the restaurant and the woman who took my order sat down a few seats away from me and stared as I meekly ate my fries under the pressure of her gaze. She was an old woman, dark hair, skin hanging off of her face and the restaurant’s uniform made the color look surreal in juxtaposition to the royal blue visor on her head. I tried to eat quickly and avoid eye contact but eventually I gave up on eating and got up to throw away what I would to have liked to eat but she stopped me before I could pass her table. “What are you?” She asked with no hesitation. My first instinct then is what my first instinct is now which is to ask, “Why the fuck is that any of your business?” But I opened my mouth and let out a defeated sigh, “Well, I don’t know, my mom is White and my dad is Black.” She nodded and said, “Okay,” as if I needed her approval to be breathing and I left slightly stunned by the experience. As soon as I got home I went upstairs to my dad’s office and relayed the story with added emphasis on how perturbed I was that someone would feel comfortable asking me that. My dad loves talking to me about being Black, it’s one of his very favorite subjects. There’s a pride there when his eyes gleam and he talks about the tone of his skin; he sees being Black as a blessing. I’ve always been confused about my body, my skin color changes every time I go out into the sun. My skin color to me matches the shade of a new tree planted in a crowded city. But I do remember him looking me in my eyes, I remember that my eyes matched his and a sense of familiarity warmed me. He said, “If anyone asks what you are, you tell them that you’re Black.”

Being Black to me is more than my skin color, I know that I’m light skinned (I’ve been “jokingly” called high yellow all of my life), and maybe judging solely off of that I would be “passing” but I have those features. The controversial ones, the type of body that everyone on the TV was taking diet pills to avoid, the lips that I would see on a someone doing Blackface. I had the features my barbies were always missing, there’s an aisle in every store with products that promise they can fix my hair and I can say I’ve invested in almost every one. They’re all the same – my body is undeniably Black and because it is Black it is political.

That’s never been a secret in my life. I don’t remember the first time my mom or dad sat me down and said, “Now, Gabriella, you’re Black and here’s what that means,” it was more like an ongoing discourse between my family members. I do, however, remember the first time it became real to me. I was probably six or seven years old and my family was living in White Center, a suburb a few miles away from Seattle. My brother had a best friend who lived across the street from my Grandma’s house, I’m not sure what his name was, probably something like Aaron. CJ (my brother), and Aaron really hit it off, I mean the kid was over at our house all of the time playing video games. They would walk to and from school together and I remember thinking he was so much softer than the rest of my brother’s rowdy friends. My mother, however, would speak in hushed tones about how his mother was racist, about how CJ could never go to Aaron’s house. Then one day CJ came home upset which wasn’t unusual, but then he told us what happened. CJ was walking home from school and he passed the Aaron’s house. His mom was in the driveway and he told my mother that she just started driving at him. Fortunately he ran out of the way in time and wasn’t harmed but it was the first time I had heard of someone hurting someone just because they looked like my brother and me. I couldn’t believe that that had happened to someone I loved, I didn’t want to believe it, I thought it was mistake. But Frantz Fanon captured my sentiments exactly, “I was not mistaken. It was hatred; I was hated, detested, and despised, not by my next-door neighbor or a close cousin, but by an entire race. I was up against something irrational (p. 97).

Race is something I’ve always been conscious of but I had to ignore it for a while. Growing up Black and having primarily White friends really did something sick to my psyche because I started to see other Black people as beautiful but me as flawed. I saw the beauty in my family members but I was lighter than them but then there was everyone else, skinny, White, short, nothing like me. No one pointed out that I was Black to me, race wasn’t a topic of conversation amongst my friends (who were primarily White “skater boys” who, when race was brought up called me a “mutt” and told me to stop talking); I couldn’t find any reflection of myself, not in the books I read or shows I watched, there was nothing of myself. I was experiencing dysphoria but not consciously, I didn’t know where the roots of the resentment I was feeling where and no one really helped me with that. I had my father of course, to tell me stories of growing up in Louisiana in the 50’s when the land was so flat he thought he could see the curve of the earth and he couldn’t’ve drank out of the same water fountain as my mother but that all felt so removed from where I was standing. I couldn’t believe that being Black in America could be psychologically damaging, that it was something that persisted and wore down your morale with age.

But then I got older and the things my father had always told me about being Black were suddenly coming into play in my own life. Like being watched when I walked around the store with my cousin, or being stopped by police officers just for them to ask what I was doing walking down the street. Men started to tell me, again, that I “wasn’t like other Black girls” and that they liked me for that. They compared me to my people and told me I was an outsider still and expected me to take it as a compliment. Then there were the men who treated me like they treated other Black women, backing me into corners and telling me they’re going to fuck me, following me off of the bus and talking about my body as I walked away. Those men treated me like an object whereas the former type of man treated me like an animal – I learned to see the difference. To add to the mess were the White women – friends, friends of friends, strangers off of the street, just White Women – approaching me and touching my hair without permission because they’ve always wanted to know what “my kind of hair” feels like. Their obsession with Blackness mixed with the fact that they would evade the subject of Blackness all together was almost as sickening as their anecdotes about being seven and wishing they had an afro. But then their mother told them that they were beautiful the way they were. And they had a whole society to back them up on that.

The resentment grew and grew until I stopped going to school and stopped leaving the house. I still wasn’t sure what the cause of my complete disinterest in society was about, it was hindering me but I felt like I was grasping at straws when trying to figure out why. I knew that what I was experiencing with people – the comments on my body, on my identity – all of the words said to me were a part of my life that wouldn’t go away. Racism was never presented to be as solvable, but simply a fundamental part of Western society which has caused it to thrive. But it didn’t feel real. I wasn’t an “Other” in Tacoma; light skin Black girls weren’t an oddity, White people were. The idea of “The Rich Man” was more exotic than my hair.

One day I got bored and applied to Evergreen, I got in, and then moved to Olympia. My brother went to Evergreen and he tried to warn me in so many words but I didn’t really get it. He told me by my Junior year I would be ready to leave and never come back. I made friends easily enough however by week three of my first quarter I was crying on the phone to my cousin explaining that I needed to leave Olympia immediately. See, being Black in Olympia feels a lot like telling a joke that no one understands; there’s a strong sense of “Why did I just do that?” mixed with, “Why don’t these people get it?” Evergreen is considered liberal because of the fact that they’ll allot a $5000 a quarter budget to the Shellfish Club not because of their diversity. I’m pretty sure that I know the majority of the Black people on campus and we wave and smile at each other like we’re beacons of hope. It doesn’t matter whether it’s intentional or not I’m almost always the token Black friend simply because there are so few of us. Every time I walk onto campus I know I’m going to be witness to something upsetting, someone is going to say something to me that offends me, and that I’m going to want to go home as soon as I can. It seems pessimistic but I can safely say that it’s true. It’s hard to continue going to school when you know most encounters you have will be psychologically damaging.

Then I went to Europe.

Now, while I was there my head was occupied dealing with the fact that I had to speak another language and that I was far away from home and I didn’t fully recognize the way I was being treated and why. There were a couple incidents where shopkeepers wouldn’t look at me or speak to me, a French drug dealer referring to Black people solely as “niggers”, and all of the street harassment was jarring but I thought it wasn’t out of the norm for me. When I got back from France I read a book, Black Skin, White Masks, by Frantz Fanon which completely changed my perception of what I experienced not just in France, but back at home.

In chapter five, The Lived Experience of the Black Man Fanon begins recounting the remarks he’d received simply walking through the streets of Paris and how raw they made him feel. When a young child with their Mother cried, “Look, Maman, look, a negro!” and the mother responded with, “Ssh! You’ll make him angry. Don’t pay attention to him, monsieur, he doesn’t realize you’re just as civilized as we are,” Fanon was at a loss. He wrote:

My body was returned to me spread-eagled, disjointed, redone, draped in mourning on this White winter’s day. The Negro is an animal, the Negro is bad, the Negro is wicked, the Negro is ugly; look, a Negro; the Negro is trembling, the Negro is trembling because he’s cold, the small boy is trembling because he’s afraid of the Negro, the Negro is trembling with cold, the cold that chills the bones, the lovely little boy is trembling because he thinks the Negro is trembling with rage, the little White boy runs to his mother’s arms: “Maman, the Negro’s going to eat me.”

The White man is all around me; up above the sky is tearing at its navel; the earth crunches under my feet and sings White, White. All this Whiteness burns me to a cinder. (p. 93)

That sensation of being gawked at, of having your body discussed and ridiculed by strangers, even children was something I had experienced over and over. When I was in Galway at a coffee shop, a child hid behind her father and began crying and when he asked why she pointed at me. She was confused and her father was embarrassed but I just wanted coffee. Even with all of my knowledge of the politics of being Black I still don’t expect my body to be verbally mangled when I’m simply trying to be. All I wanted was coffee. Fanon writes a lot about wishing to simply be able to exist without the ignorance of others constantly bombarding him and my wishes for myself aren’t far off.

So, how do I feel about being myself? About being Black? I see myself in Spirits Swirl by Levoy Exil in 1991. He’s an artist from Haiti who used abstraction to capture dysphoria.

In the center is a Black girl, in a circle that resembles the sun, but with eyes. Around her women surround her, twisting around each other with their languid, brightly colored bodies. The girl in the center is visually overwhelmed by the activity outside of her bubble. All of the eyes in the painting are staring at the viewer, there’s a flatness to their faces and bodies and yet one feels as if they could plunge into the scene if one looks too closely. It’s ghostly and mystical but not in a horror film way; the figures around her are spirituality and ancestry floating around this Black woman constantly. Her ancestors call to her, and even though she appears intimidated, there’s also a sense of openness and possession as the spirits reach for her.

That’s the best way I can describe what it feels like to be me. My history doesn’t just follow me around the store, I carry my Blackness in my heart every day. I make sure not to forget my history, to stand up for the people who died in the process of making it so I could attend schools and apply eyeliner in the same bathroom as my White friends. Despite the process of demonization we’ve experienced, despite slavery and other forms of systematic racism that hinder my daily life, I’m still inclined to agree with my father. Being Black has given me a valuable perspective on the world and features I have grown to admire in myself. And I’m proud of that. If anyone asks me what I am, I tell them I’m Black.

The Lived Experiences of a Black Woman: Part Two

Throughout my short lifetime as a Black woman I’ve encountered a variety of different definitions of what it means to be that. I’ve been told that I’m a Black girl because I don’t put up with bullshit (especially from White men), I’ve been told that it’s because I’m stubborn, because I clap my hands when I’m trying to make a point, or because I know every word to “Burn” by Usher. I possess all of those qualities, sure, but whether or not they define my Blackness is up for debate. There’s this perception of Black people as angry and hard that I’ve encountered my entire life, and through my discussions with other Black people, specifically my family, I’ve found that said perception has been incorporated in mainstream thought as a process of creating the popular culture in opposition to our anger.

Within the Black community is a tenderness and softness which is completely ignored by mainstream culture. Our identity, which is one of support and love, has been portrayed as a culture of desolation, trouble, and danger. In an essay called, Cultural Identity and Diaspora, Stuart Hall writes, “What recent theories of enunciation suggest is that, though we speak, so to say ‘in our own name’, of ourselves and from our own experience, nevertheless who speaks, and the subject who is spoken of, are never identical, never exactly in the same place. Identity is not as transparent or unproblematic as we think.” (p. 21) So, our perceptions of ourselves as Black people is going to differ by default from what an outsider would interpret our society as being. That fact mixed with the institutionalized racism prevailing in Western society creates a schism which supports an “Us vs. Them” ideology which is so deeply engrained in mainstream thought it can be summarized by, “You’re not like other Black people.”

Stuart makes the point that Western society has attempted to push their definition of the Black identity into Mainstream thought as well as into the Black community. Mainstream society is built in direct opposition to Black culture and dismisses the Black identity, yet with examples such as my third grade teacher telling me that we live in America where racism ended with the Civil Rights movement, it’s obvious that there’s an agenda (intentional or unintentional) that projects oppressive images of our Blackness onto us. On the subject of cultural manipulation Hall writes, “They [Europeans] had the power to make us see and experience ourselves as ‘Other.’ Every regime of representation is a regime of power formed, as Foucault reminds us, by the fatal couplet ‘power/knowledge.’ But this kind of knowledge is internal, not external. It is one thing to position a subject or set of peoples as the Other of a dominant discourse. It is quite another thing to subject them to that ‘knowledge,’ not only as a matter of imposed will and domination, by the power of inner compulsion and subjective conformation to the norm.” (p.23) When I think back on all of the Black people I’ve met who hate their Blackness, who invest in skin bleach and tell me my hair needs “work” because it’s natural, it all comes down to their subscription to the knowledge being imposed upon us by White people in our lives and in the media, and the incorporation of White supremacist ideals into our consciousness.

I recently went to see Cornel West speak, I’ve always been a fan of his rhetoric. What captured me the most about his speech was his definition of Blackness as soulfulness. Our music touches the heart just like our food – we are a community of emotion.

That idea was something I had been struggling to convey for a long time. My idea of Black Culture is going over to my Grandmother’s house with the whole family there, my uncles talking over one another at deafening tones; Blackness is loud, joyous and spiritual. My idea of Blackness is sitting on the floor between the thighs of someone pulling my hair with a comb, me crying because I’m tender-headed, and being soothed by the smell of coconut oil and the cold of the air hitting the scalp between my braids. It’s going out tanning and having no discussions about tanning lotion, it’s smiling at every Black person I see on the way to wherever I’m going because we have an assumed shared experience.

For the most part we know we are not in the mess of Western expansion alone – we have each other. We are hard on one another, constantly striving for the best for our loved ones and ourselves to prove to everyone else what we are capable of. It’s my understanding from my experience and the experiences of other Black people I know that we do not have a culture of individualism. When one of our own dies by the gun of a cop under suspicious circumstances we don’t write it off as another tragedy. We grieve. We aren’t mourning because it could have been any one of us, not because so many of the Black people who were being murdered were under 25, but because it’s a limb being severed off of our collective body. Except the limb is being chopped off every eight hours. Living in a society where the rate of Black people being killed is nearly, (if not completely) genocidal has a tendency to push the oppressed together.

Dr. West also pointed out the way our ancestors reacted to their oppressors. When my ancestors were taken from their country and sold into slavery they did not revolt and kill their masters, not many slaves did. They sang and they asked God to come down and tremble the water for them. They asked for movement, and they kept hope alive instead of succumbing to the terrible conditions they were living in. I tell my friends that the difference between White Christianity and Black Christianity is that Black people love talking about Jesus, but White people love talking about Satan. The Devil is always around the corner to White Christians, always lurking in the shadows that are dark like Black skin. They talk about “Evil” as if they’ve never dabbled in the subject, their histories are clear of any wrongdoings because they colonized the world under a “God appointed Queen.” Black people, on the other hand, have seen evil. Black people have seen what it can do. Evil take us from our home into a foreign land under a whip, evil has displaced us, hosed us down in the streets. Evil shoots at us for buying skittles and then becomes a millionaire and nationally recognized “celebrity.”

An important part of Black culture is art (painting, drawing, music, dance, all of it.) Our art is something which conveys our struggles as well as our livelihood. Black people aren’t typically associated with the artistic trends we’ve created (ie. rock and roll, rap, jazz, blues, gospel, just to name a few music genres,) and we are very rarely seen as artists. Throughout my education, the Black artist has been presented to me as a rarity. As if it wasn’t expected of us, as if the aspects of our culture like dancing and graffiti aren’t relevant or sophisticated enough to fit into the mold of what the Western mentality deems beautiful. Our creativity and how it’s expressed strikes the outsider as fruitless because our experience and where our inspiration comes from differs greatly. As Frantz Fanon wrote in Black Skin, White Masks, “I am Black; I am in total fusion with the world, in sympathetic affinity with the earth, losing my id in the heart of the cosmos— and the White man, however intelligent he may be, is incapable of understanding Louis Armstrong or songs from the Congo. I am Black, not because of a curse, but because my skin has been able to capture all the cosmic effluvia. I am truly a drop of sun under the earth. Fanon, Frantz (2008-09-10). Black Skin, White Masks (pp. 27-28). Grove/Atlantic, Inc.. Kindle Edition. “ He’s communicating the oneness with the soul involved in being Black in juxtaposition with “White culture”/Western thought. Being a “drop of sun under the earth” summons a different kind of art than being of European descent.

Henry Ossawa Tanner was born in Philadelphia in 1859. Being of mixed race he was accepted into the art scene in Paris where he spent most of his life. His work was fairly successful amongst the French elite who have a long history of Orientalism and fetishization of “Other” cultures. Boime writes, “The White attitude constituted in large part both a dilemma and advantage for Tanner, whose intellectual achievements and even physical appearance so closely approximated the ‘norm’ of the dominant elite.” (416) Although he was accepted into the art community Tanner wasn’t quiet about his experiences as a Black American and his role in the art world. He was quoted as saying, “I believe it, the Negro blood counts and counts to my advantage – though it has caused me at times a life of great humiliation and sorrow – unlimited ‘kick’ and ‘cuffs’ – but that is the source of all my talents (if I have any) I do not believe, any more than I believe it all comes from my English ancestry.” 417 Boime goes on to write, “Tanner undertook his series of genre pictures so late in the century in an effort to counter the negative stereotype of the Black and to revive genre painting by seeking to transform its original origin.” (417)His mission was to showcase the beauty he saw in his own people as accurately as possible. Tanner was attempting to capture memory-like scenes of childhood that the viewer could relate with by representing the warmness of nostalgia with Black people. That theme is apparent in paintings such as, “The Banjo Lesson.” In This portrait of rural life a boy is on the knee of who we can assume to be his father or a father figure. The little boy is almost the same size as the banjo. He’s small but trying and the father is keeping a watchful eye over the boy’s movements. Tanner’s brush strokes are reminiscent of those in Impressionist paintings – their shortness causes the painting to look blurry and in motion. The painting has the quality of something one remembers – the shadows and the art fading into the wall make the viewer look at the human interaction as opposed to the entirety of the painting.

Henry Ossawa Tanner wasn’t the only Black artist to depict Black people in a thought provoking way. Jean Michel Basquiat used his graffiti style to create a counter narrative in juxtaposition with the rest of the art made during the 20th century. Know for his colorful and unconventional paintings, Black people and our history were often subjects of his pieces.

Basquiat’s painting All Color Cast (Part III) exemplifies the evaluation of Black history by the artist. On a mustard yellow background a crudely drawn Black man bears his teeth. His chest is labeled “Chest” while his hand is labeled “Paw” – this is Basquiat’s humorous but honest way of acknowledging the dehumanization of Black people. On the right of the male figure is “China” above “Haiti” with arrows drawing a path between them. Above the man is written, “Home: Two Visitors: One” which could be an allusion to the Haitian Revolution seeing as on the left in small letters connected by an arrow to “Jersey Joe Walcott 2004” is, “Toussaint L’Overture,” the man who, like Joe Walcott, became famous for fighting. Toussaint L’Overture, however, fought during the Haitian Revolution and became governor of Haiti.

Basquiat is presenting Black history (or fragments of it,) in a way which accurately depicts the complexity of our collective past. There are so many layers to this painting, so many things that are written are connected to each other in ways the viewer wouldn’t have thought; one gets the sense that though this painting is chaotic, not a single thing is out of place or accidental.

The Lived Experiences of a Black Woman: Part One

When you see a Black person, what do you see? If I asked you to picture a Black person in your head, which features would you accentuate to let yourself know that you’ve imagined an accurate representation? Have you ever stopped to think about why it is that you’ve developed whatever associations are coming to mind now? Have you considered the external influences on your perception of people?

I can’t tell you where it all began; there’s always been a prejudice against darker people throughout history. I’ve never been in a World History class where the instructor says, “Now, such and such year is when the prejudice against dark skinned people was conceived by this dude”. That’s not really how it works. Throughout my studies it seems like shadeism of some sort has been incorporated in cultures all over the world, but I’m not here to make an argument for universal biases being a natural tendency because I’m almost positive I don’t believe in that being inherent. What I can do, however, is look at the way the image of us has transformed over time creating a depiction of us in the mainstream media that doesn’t even begin to capture the brilliance I see.

I never really had to think about these things when I lived in Tacoma. I went to a school where it was rare for there to be more than three White people in the school. Whiteness was reserved to the highly resented staff, the only White authority figures respected by the students were the ones who proved their ability to speak our language and break up a fight. It’d been like that in elementary and middle school, too, so it’s safe to say moving to Olympia, Washington was a culture shock. I went from a classroom setting where we learned about code switching and talks about how I won’t be received well by professionals because of my skin color to a place where I could go hours and hours without seeing someone who even vaguely resembled me.

The first group project of my Evergreen career was a presentation on a cult in ancient Rome. I was in the basement of the library in a study room with two people who were nice enough; I don’t remember how we got on the subject of racism but as I would learn it would be a topic that got brought up frequently in my presence, because of my presence. The man sitting across from me fidgeted with his baseball cap and casually told me that I’d never experienced racism because I wasn’t from the south. See, he was from the South and that fact apparently made him an expert on the subject of terrible biases. He said that I was lighter than his Black friends back home who have experienced “real” racism and I couldn’t possibly understand what it was like to truly be Black. He then began talking about my features and asked if my hair melted when I straightened it. I told him that I didn’t understand what he was asking. He said, “When I see my friend’s girlfriend straighten her hair it melts. Your type of hair melts when you use a flat iron, I’ve seen it.” It did not matter how much I objected to this idea of our hair being this magical, exotic substance growing out of our heads that melts when it gets too hot, he dismissed my narrative in favor of his distorted White supremacist ideals. I can’t count how many times strangers have walked up to me and began petting my hair because they had an idea that my body was open game. It became immediately apparent after my first few weeks in Olympia that the concept of Black people’s bodies being objects was deeply ingrained in the mainstream psyche, revealing itself in various ways.

What happened? I can’t believe that we’ve always been seen only as objects in the eyes of White people. There’s proof, look at Peter Paul Rubens one of the greatest Renaissance painters. The Four Rivers created in 1616 depicts the God’s of the world’s greatest rivers: Nile, Tigris, Ganges, and Euphrates. Surrounding them are cherubs wrestling with alligators effortlessly while a tiger hisses at divinity toying with nature. Each River God is paired with nymphes who act as feminine power for the river’s flow.

In the center of a painting is a Black woman as a Nymph accompanying Nile, there’s no distortion of her features – she is just as beautiful and alluring as the rest of the Nymphs. She’s the only person engaged with the audience, looking us directly in the eye as if she were inviting us into the painting, to submerge ourselves in the depth of the dark blue tones. While they didn’t make Nile Black (even though he was the one God typically represented as a Black man [p. 348 Black People in European Art]) the association with the people living on the land that the Nile river flows through is represented with the Nymph. She is not an accessory in this painting. She serves a role on conveying a theme and works together with the other deities depicted to do that effectively. She was not portrayed as a caricature of her Blackness; she had a central role that involved her personhood and heritage as opposed to reducing her role to her race.

There are countless depictions of Black people within Renaissance art, and while it might be due to the realism of the era, I could not find any racist or tragically distorted representations of Black people in Europe during the 1600’s, which is coincidental since the first colony came to Virginia in the beginning of that century. Depictions of Black people transformed from the beginning of the century to the end.

The French Encounter with Africans by William Cohen documents misconceptions and prejudices created and perpetuated by Europeans. Cohen writes, “In Europe the color Black denoted evil and depravity and, in an age that believed in symbols, some meaning was attached to the fact that some humans were Black.” (p. 13) What did this meaning consist of? The theories as to why Blackness existed varied from one xenophobic perspective to another. Everything from Black people being descendents of Cain (our skin was turned Black by God to show our affiliation with Satan), to the idea that Africans were born White but turned Black by the sun, dirt, or paint. (pg. 13) The Europeans had negative associations with Blackness from their first encounters. Cohen notes that, “Frenchmen saw the Blackness of Africans as symbolic of some inner depravity, since they thought the color aesthetically unappealing. They followed a tradition rooted in the classical doctrine of physiognomos, which held that what was not beautiful was somehow depraved.” (p.14) In short, because the French and other Europeans went to Africa and were confronted with the antithesis of their societal standards they began to look for “Rational” reasons as to why Blackness existed. The conclusions they came to were that Europeans were blatantly superior simply because they didn’t understand the differences they had with Africans and could not accept them as equals because of their polarity.

Behind the Eurocentric Veils by Clinton M. Jean is titled effectively; this 100 page book covers a span of history from the slavery era to the Vietnam war to evaluate the systematic racism perpetuated by Europeans and how it affects the identity of minorities, specifically Black people. He argues that because Reason is the new God in the Western world, this powerful ideal has othered Second and Third world countries which are seen as primitive and painted in a negative light for the European public. He uses specific examples of important philosophers and sociologists to emphasize the fact that oppression is an inherent part of their ideological structures. One person Jean believes is integral in the process of White supremacist motives being incorporated into modern thought is Hegel. Jean wrote, “Hegel himself described the aboriginal Americans as vanishing at the mere breath of European presence. His stripes on African culture were even harsher: cannibals, traffickers in the sales of their children, primitives (heathens, too) needing the civilized schooling of Western slavery.” (p. 15) The European attempt to understand African culture was a massive failure. Mainstream thought drastically transformed along with the rise of colonies. I suppose it’s easier to support terrible things when there’s widespread propaganda telling the gun-toting majority that the people suffering are less human than they are, especially when the rhetoric is supported by popular philosophers. It’s probably easier not to think about why you have what you have when someone bled for it. And with popular philosophers supporting and creating a rhetoric of White superiority.

Paintings like Her Mistress’s Clothes by an anonymous artist in 1815 effectively boil down the apparent agenda of White supremacy. In this painting is a woman standing in front of the mirror with a menacing hand clutching the face of her Black servant. The Black woman is wearing an ill fitting necklace with flowers, her White dress is pearly  compared to her skin. Her face is flattened and compressed, her hair is done in the same style as her Mistress – a cheap, thinning version at least. The comparison one’s mind makes when looking at this painting is jarring; the emanating quality of the White woman’s skin dominates the photograph. The woman is holding her servant’s head in place in front of what I can assume is a mirror. It’s a dialogue – she’s telling her servant to look at herself while she’s submerged in the Western in that moment. She’s telling her that in order to be beautiful her servant must look and dress like her, something truly unattainable.

The message of White superiority is blatant. The body of a Black woman has been controversial since the conception of this country and has been distorted and skewed under the White male gaze. Our bodies are not seen as beautiful or valuable, but rather as an instrument for pleasure. Our bodies are not seen as strong regardless of the fact that the prosperous life White Americans revel in would not be possible without our sweat and our blood. Here you see the Black woman’s body displayed by a White woman as flawed, only acceptable because of her temporary subscription to Western dress.

Another point of tension between Africans and Europeans were their drastic differences religious practice. In The French Encounter with Africans, Cohen explains, “The Africans’ animism piqued Europeans’ interest, as perhaps their most prominent feature next to coloring.” (p. 15) Missionaries attempted to transform Africans into Christian but weren’t met with great success. The association with Africans and Blackness to hedonism were deepened using Biblical morality. Cohen writes, “… After 1700 Africans were depicted as responsible for their lack of Christianity, a conclusion due, it was said, to their moral failings and to their bestiality.” (p. 17) The African failure to complacently conform to European Christian morals made them sinners.

While the demonization of Black people and Black culture insisted, the fetishization of non-Western culture grew and flourished. The relics which were once used as evidence against African humanity are now being sold in Sotheby’s catalogues for hundreds of thousands of euros. Europeans can appreciate what Black people create (for example: our art, our music, the United States of America,) however when it comes to us as people there are moralistic differences which have greatly hindered unity.

Cette tête commémorative royale, Edo, Royaume de Bénin is item 109 in Sotheby’s Art Africain et Océan which is a catalogue of two patron’s personal collections. They describe the statue, “Cette tête représente un oba, indentifié par la couronne royale, le bandeau frontal et le très haut collier à 28 rangs composé de perles de corail. Chaque côte de la téte est orné d’un motif en forme d’ailette, au born ajouré. Le visage présente des traits naturalistes travaillés aves une très grande finesse, les sourcils signifiés par des hachures réguliéres, de trés fines cercles gravés sous les yeux dont ils suivant la ligne courbe, le front orné du motif classique de triple scarifications.” (p. 26) But what they’re failing to mention when regaling all of the ways which art historians deduce the meaning of these ancient pieces of art  is how these pieces of art were procured. What they’re failing to mention is that the selling of sacred art of another culture, specifically Black culture, that has been demonized and degraded they are further perpetuating the idea that our culture is valueless. These pieces of art were not made necessarily for Western consumption and yet Europeans insist on placing value on our art as opposed to our livelihood. This phenomenon in and of itself is evocative of the dehumanization of Black people and how only valued for our usefulness.

The representation of Black people in Western art and in the media has rarely shown our true colors. There is no exploration of our depth, only our fetishized backgrounds and the disfiguring of our identities. However, while the Western world has created this depiction of us which is simply offensive and wrong, it’s caused Black people to create a counter narrative. Now, this narrative may be ignored by Western media, but it’s still alive. We are actively trying to reshape our image and prove that we are more than slaves in their mistress’s clothes.

on Proust and Love 4/26/2015

We (when I say “We” I mean not we as a class, but rather the people I associate myself with who insist that one has to persuade their way into a relationship with something in order to be close to someone, and dissect them in an intimate setting), have this idea of love being something that comes later. A sensation that comes after the fact, a practical skill, something we have need experience to achieve. I can’t count how many times I’ve been asked by a friend, “Do you believe in love at first sight?”

For Proust that isn’t a question. Look at Marcel and Albertine – love is something that unfolds in us when we come in contact with our perception of beauty. Love is not something we chose, it’s something which a person’s eyes or smile or hair possesses that resonates with us.

For instance, when Marcel is constantly running into these girls that have a power over his sensuality, these girls who were individuals and not aesthetically similar to one another yet were an entity to Marcel, he talks about love for them as if there’s no choice but to be glassy eyed and heartfelt. “I was in love with none of them, loving them all, and yet the possibility of meeting them was in my daily life the sole elements of delight, alone made to burgeon in me those high hopes by which every obstacle is surmounted, hopes ending often in fury if I had not seen them.”* An infatuation or obsession is rooted in prior knowledge or interaction with a party – Marcel is in love. He loves the carelessness of their girlhood (even though he constantly objects to it), in love with his position being an outsider looking into the fish tank.

Marcel, throughout the text, has been presenting love as an invincible force, something which one immediately succumbs to. Love is the missing piece, always. He doesn’t lust after the bodies underneath the clothes so much as he yearns for the validation of the force within him telling him that interaction with these girls is what he needs.

And yet he presents love as temporary, something that can come and go with desire. “Variance of a belief, annulment also of love, which, pre-existent and mobile comes to rest at the image of any woman simply because that will be almost impossible to attainment,”* He’s talking about love as if there’s a well of it within a human’s emotional bank. Or rather that there is a tidal wave of  it that comes and goes with the moon of lust, desire, and beauty. Of course the element of unattainability makes love all the more exciting, not having what you desire and not knowing whether it will really be yours or not gives the imagination a job. Proust proposes that love is something that is permanent but only because it’s dormant within us. The actual feeling of being “in love” with someone is temporary and has little to do with you but more to do with the qualities someone possesses.

The Proustian definition of love is volatile and riddled with toxicity and trouble but most of all passion which can be devoted to a simple feature or an aura. The popular, modern idea of love loses the passion and ferocity and is instead about patience and habit. It’s about learning personality traits in their entirety and in an accurate way – Proust’s idea of love has nothing to do with habit and definitely not accuracy. Love, like many things in the novel, is about imagination, the feelings that the imagination conjures, and the mental and physical disruption love creates.

 

* The version of Within a Budding Grove didn’t have page numbers for me to reference, sorry.

on association

I was just trying to clean the house and clear my mind. There’s an empty bowl of hair bleach in my sink that’s buried underneath unwashed dishes from a dinner party we had without you.

On one of our last good days you came over and had a sore throat. I quickly slid into my motherly role and began cutting vegetables for a soup to ease your throat. It helped that I could chop something into little pieces instead of look you in your dreary eyes that told me you’d had several nights of no sleep. You were excited about a writing competition you wanted both of us to enter, you didn’t want to show me how excited you were but I saw it when I finally did look in your eye. You had this prideful look, like you were going to win.

I wasn’t sure if the soup was going to turn out for some reason, I was so worried you weren’t going to like it. You’re such a fucking picky eater. You tell me you hate everything I make and then take second helpings in secret. I should have kept that in mind but I was just focusing on the current moment and the pressure that a good day had on me. I couldn’t fuck it up, I didn’t want to push too far for answers I knew you had but wouldn’t tell.

The soup started boiling. I sat down in my little dining room table, across from you, like a king and queen of trash with better things to do than love each other. I begged you to let me read your tarot, you said you didn’t want to know the future and I said I wanted to know, to keep it in mind. For when I wanted to help, when it wasn’t a good day.

According to the cards he needed to remove himself from the party scene and harness his untapped creative potential. Nothing he didn’t know, he was too smart to be swayed by something like that. Then a high priestess appeared, sensual and yet over worked, full of power and love to give to someone who doesn’t deserve it. Another card appeared that warned him to appreciate the people in his life, to tell him that they’re temporary but invaluable. Another card told him he was the third person in a relationship and was spiteful about it, it said he needed to talk about the feelings he was holding back.

I said, “Are there any relationships you need to evaluate, S? Is there anything that we need to talk about?”

He held up his hand in front of me, “I’m building a brick wall,” he said. “We’re not talking about this anymore, there’s nothing to talk about.”

The soup began to overboil and I ran over to the stove while you swiped the spread away. You have this way of creating so much havoc in my mind that sound slows down and everything in front of me seems untouchable; motion becomes irrelevant. All I feel is burning in my ribs from every marb black I’ve ever smoked with you ever and maybe the feeling of my heart breaking. What was going through my mind was everything you said we didn’t have to talk about when you asked, “Is this frosting?” I couldn’t hear anything until you screamed. I turned around, and you had dipped a spoon into the bleach and put it in your mouth and then you were spitting it all out. “You didn’t answer me, I thought it was frosting!” You were laughing and gagging and I was embarrassed and gave you a bottle of water.

I’m going to tell my roommate that I’ll wash every dish except for that bowl of hair bleach. She’s the one who was dyeing her hair in the first place. I can’t touch the metal or the soggy foam without thinking of his laugh and the wall he built that day that’s gotten higher since.

Close Reading 4/15/2015

 

With the end of the Swann in Love section comes a revisitation to the narrator’s account of his own memories. The topic of memory association is brought back, this time less specific to the person and the place but of the mental stimulation behind a name of a place. The power that a name holds is entirely subjective to one’s person’s imagination and perception according to Proust. Not only that, but it’s possible to recreate the sensation from being in a place from simply thinking about the name of place and the meaning one attaches to it.

Proust goes into the separation between the reality of a place and the fantasy the mind creates writing, “But if these names absorbed forever the image I had of these towns, it was only by transforming that image, by subjecting it’s reappearance in me to their own laws; consequence of this they made it more beautiful, but also more different from what the towns of Normandy or Tuscany could be in reality, and, by increasing the arbitrary joys of my imagination, aggravated the future disappointment of my travels.” (p. 403) He’s saying that mental experience and physical experience are not one in the same and have the potential to destroy your perceived reality. When one recalls a place in their mental sphere they have the ability to manipulate the details, but in reality the luxury of romanticization is lost. The thin line between imagined reality and factual reality has been crossed continuously throughout Swann’s Way. Everything from Swann’s love of Odette to the narrator’s fear of being kicked out of his house for wanting a kiss goodnight makes the reader anxious and uncomfortable because it isn’t apparent what should be taken literally. Even when a narrator is reliable and is doing their best to be factual, Proust is saying again that the truth is subject to one’s interpretation.

The importance of words and names in memory is discussed further. He says, “How much more individuality still did they assume from being designated by names, names that were theirs alone. Words present us with little pictures of things, clear and familiar, like those that are hung on the walls of schools to give children an example of what a workbench is, a bird, an anthill, things conceived of as similar to all others of the same sort.” (p. 403) Proust begins by saying that there is a benefit of a thing having a name, that the name brings to us the mental image of an object. However from what he was saying earlier, this image doesn’t necessarily do one justice when trying to recall something when the mind distorts and skews the actuality of an object or event.

He goes on to write, “But names present a confused image of people – and of towns, which they accustom us to believe are individual, unique like people- an image which derives from them, from the brightness or darkness of their tone, the color with which it is painted uniformly, like one of those posters, entirely red, in which, because of the limitations of the process used or by a whim of the designer, not only the sky and the sea are blue or red, but the boats, the church, the people in the streets.” (p. 404) People and places become exceptions to the clarity which a name provides and instead they have the opposite effect on the mind than an object does. There are too many variables in humans and cities to be able to manifest a clear vision of the person or place; it’s up to imagination to fill in the parts of a memory which are too vague to bring the comfort the narrator wants from his memories. Things which are not definitive, memories that aren’t conscious, those are what the imagination amplify and adjust.

Further explanation comes from his example of Parma, “Because the name of Parma, one of the towns I had most wanted to visit ever since I had read La Chartreuse, seemed to me compact, mauve, and soft, if anyone mentioned a certain house in Parma in which I would be staying, he gave me the pleasure of thinking I would be living in a house that was smooth, compact, mauve, and soft, that bore no relation to the houses of any real town in Italy, since I had composed it in my imagination with the help only of that heavy syllable, Parme, in which no air circulates, and of all that I had made it absorb of Stendhalian softness and the tint of violets.” (p. 404) Creating a life in one’s mind for a word or a place is a recurring theme in Swann’s Way. Swann created a reality for himself around an idea of a person – Odette – who he only knew well enough to fantasize about. He adored her because he had associated every part of her with some joy he derived from the alternate reality of being in love with her. What happened with Odette is the same thing which happens when one visits a town which they have dreamt about: the reality does not live up the expectation and disappointment triumphs.

The narrator is attempting to describe the heaviness of Balbec, the place recalled which was so much grander in his mind than in reality. He knows that the dramatization happening is simply that, yet there’s a solace in Balbec being part fiction for him, as there was in Combray. He writes of Balbec in the same idealized way, “As for Balbec, it was one of those names in which, as on a piece of old Norman pottery that retains the color of the earth from which it was taken, one can still see depicted the representation of some outmoded custom, of some feudal right, of some locality in an earlier condition, of an abandoned habit of pronunciation which has formed it’s  heteroclite syllables…” (p. 404) Here he is comparing the comfort he finds in Balbec to a tribal language which is lost to the world, something instinctual, something which is unexplainable and yet automatic. It speaks to the natural quality of memory and association.

Swann’s Way has taken a look into the memory of a particular man and two specific places in a way which can be described by the selected section. Everything from Combray and his mother’s kiss to Swann and Odette have specific associations to the narrator and within those things are elements which have been emphasized and minimized in order to fit a certain perspective.

i’m majoring in leaving

I have always had a hard time leaving home. When I was a kid I would have panic attacks when I’d go away to summer camp and I wouldn’t let myself have a good time until I heard my mother’s voice on the phone. When I moved away for college I made sure to make a home for myself, not in the dorms, but in other people who would not have my mother’s touch but would fill parts of me I didn’t know were empty. Washington is my home, in it’s precipitation is all of my memories and all of my love. I talked about leaving all the time, absent mindedly, but I always talked about forever. Or at least a long time. I wanted that distance, I wanted to be able to love these people and this place more but the web I had spun for myself and the beauty of it was entirely relying on my place in it. Still, I bought the ticket to France and I did it before most people in the program. I was ready.

It’s surprising what you’ll part with when you figure out what you want.

What sealed the deal for me was the architecture. I knew I couldn’t find those vaulted ceilings and reliefs in Seattle or Tacoma or Olympia or in the living room of my poorly made house. It struck me that though I was letting go of a lot (albeit temporarily), I would gain invaluable experiences and those were the experiences I truly wanted to pursue. It was the first time I was faced with the truth of what I wanted and I treated myself fairly by tearing myself away from home. For the first time my absence would be noted not just by my family at home who fed me spaghetti every birthday and brought me to church every Sunday (like good God fearing Christians), but my family in a town where a sense of “community” is a joke. Special people, all of them. My former family sent me off with hugs and well wishes while my latter family wished me luck with forties and drugs.

And then there I was waiting in the terminal, reading teen fiction, and eating caramels I had meant to save for my Homestay family in Rennes; across from me two children fought over an iPad while their mother stared deeply into her blackberry like if she bent down far enough she would be able to fall into the screen and away from the children whose voices were prepubescent and shrill. I looked around me quickly expecting to see someone ready to hold my hand from one family or the other but instead all I saw were my bags. I immediately became envious of the children in front of me. I wanted to be able to bring home with me, too.

I could not do that. All I had was a picture of my mother in my wallet and a Christmas themed bracelet that I hadn’t taken off in two weeks (and wouldn’t remove for another year). It wasn’t enough but at the same time it was too much, I mean, being reminded of what you’re leaving can break your heart. Even if it’s only for a little while.

But then it was our turn to go. I watched the airplane roll into the gate and my heart didn’t race. It stopped. I couldn’t breathe for a moment. I blacked out to flashbacks of the last time I was on a plane to Florida next to a German kid who wouldn’t stop eating and wouldn’t let me go to the bathroom. Deep breaths weren’t helping, I was on autopilot as the people around me rushed to line up and sort their boarding passes. I froze for a moment forgetting the hectic scene around me to look outside at the Evergreens in the distance not swaying for the wind, black against the achromatic sky. My senses came back to me and I reprimanded myself for being so melodramatic, so removed from the bigger picture – I told myself the trees and the grey would be there when I got back.

And then I was up in the sky and the screen on the chair in front of me told me the plane was heading northeast and I realized I had never gone in that direction before. I flew over houses and my fingers touched the glass only to remind myself that I could touch nothing I loved. Those things were as unattainable as the clouds we were ascending through. Everything around me was clean, even the air. I had the option to be upset about so many things, (leaving always leaves the people I love a little bloody), but there was nothing to be done. My words would be at home, but that’s all that would linger. And that helped me go to sleep.

We landed in Iceland and then Norway and then Oslo. I wandered around each airport trying not to listen to all of the languages I didn’t know. I was in the air for a little over twenty four hours and when I finally landed in Charles de Gaulles and heard all of the words I’d been studying eight years prior to that moment, what I had been working towards became less of a concept and more of a paralyzing fear. I made a friend on the plane but she didn’t know any French, we shared a taxi ride into the city because I told her I’d let her stay at my apartment with Kerry. Forty euros later we were in the 10th arrondissement; she was trying to find the building where I was staying while I fumbled with our luggage and admired the night life surrounding us. Everyone was drunk and on a bike, all of the girls were screaming, “Attendez-moi!” at men four blocks ahead of them, it was one in the morning and everything was open like it was the afternoon. After finding Kerry and depositing all of my things in our room we immersed ourselves in culture by drinking overpriced mojitos under a heated lamp smoking the last of my American Spirits from back home. I didn’t understand what was happening around me but I didn’t need to. That first night is what I visualize when I think of relief.

The next day I was on my own while Kerry was in class. I wanted to go see the city but I’ve never had the best navigational skills. I got very, very lost. Strangely lost, seemingly perpetually. I stayed on the M11 until I had to be escorted off. I walked up the stairs of the metro, turned a corner, and ended up at Notre Dame. No picture does it justice, nothing can describe the magnificence of the glass, the stone, the light. It might have been the cigarettes or the fact that I hadn’t eaten but I think it might have been sheer wonder that fucked me up; my knees went weak and my hand didn’t leave my heart. Oh, my heart ached when my eyes traced every stitch of the dauphin’s robes, I trembled at the altar of St. Peter, I stopped breathing when I looked up and the rose window was staring down at me like the eye of God. Say what you will about religion or God but there is something holy about that place that dismissed the embarrassment of my earlier ventures.

I felt forgiven in more than one way. I was blown into the cathedral and my doubt was blown out as if the saints knew that my soul belonged there and not my mind.

I grew up in awe of stained glass. A little girl at St. Elizabeth’s church always tracing my fingers along the iron molding while the preacher preached. Art has always been my God, my religion. I had more than a spiritual experience. I’m still shaking.