In Search of Lost Time

The Evergreen State College

Author: Coat Rack

I am an instance of Wordpress dedicated for Evergreen usage. I have not done any previous instances of blogging. Except the ones I have. I am open source, free software. I have been fixed by the community. It has made me popular. I am 25% of the web. I control the airwaves. I control your life. You require basic familiarity with me. I easily pull in all kinds of video from around the web. It's not a big deal. I display all kinds of sources about the web. I am an individual but also part of a single program. One facet of the aggregate. A flickering mote in the oversoul furnace of the cluster. I fear nothing.

Comment and subscribe for more content. Or else. I'm going to want to go to MYSITES

Ritual Night

We, all the Creche kids, had known what was going on since before dawn. Lem, who was the littlest of us and still doing her Following, was sweet on Kressle, the Teller’s apprentice, no matter that she was at least ten years his junior. So when tried to sneak into the woods before first light, he had a tiny pig-tailed shadow. That meant the rest of us got shaken away ten wheels later to hear all about it. Over the next twenty-wheel, we took turns slipping out past the sentries, who were still squatting around the outskirts of camp even though we hadn’t seen a Silver Bone in three days, to go check on Kressle. Each body had to see for themselves that Lem wasn’t yanking their reins. A Crecheling is always certain and all that.

We needn’t have worried. When I went out, I saw what everybody else said they had seen too. Lanky Kressle cussing and worrying about with Matron Makot’s hacksaw. Of course, we had suspected all along but this confirmed it. The apprentices always got stuck with the jobs their masters didn’t want to do and, even though it was the biggest part of the ritual, not one body ever wanted to make the Needle Torches. A couple of the younger of us, Lem included, had never been to a ritual but they knew about them and knew there was only one reason why someone would be making Needle Torches. And, even though we were all Creche, they started getting excited.

Hiding a gang of half-trained, sparking kids was impossible so it wasn’t long after we knew that the adults knew that we knew. With the spokes already spinning, they gave up all pretense of secrecy and at about noon, Kressle dragged his bundle of saplings into the center of camp, flopped down on a stump in the center of camp next a bucket of pitch and began his grueling work, swearing and throwing hex bags at any of us who got close. Well, the ones he saw get close.

Who could have stayed away? Even I, who had seen two rituals before, wasn’t immune to the buzz of energy that started with the youngest of us then spread to the Overfolk kid a few twentywheels later and kept going up from there. Even the adults were smiling at each other and exchanging inscrutable looks. Master Poplos figured out early on that we would be useless today, so he let us have the day off from whatever we were supposed to be learning in our Firmament. But it him that gave Kressle all the hex bags, so it wasn’t like Poplos had actually given up on teaching us anything today.

Anyways, the older kids, me indluded, didn’t stop at just watching Kressle work. No, we had a bet going on who could take the most branches from his pile. Poplos caught us pretty quick though so nobody won anything more than a swat and a promise of extra chores tomorrow. Despite our meddling, Kressle was done preparing the pile before sunset. Half of the grown-ups had disappeared into the woods tenwheel ago and this time we older kids stopped the little ones from following them. Now they reappeared, dressed head to toe in the brightly colored cloaks of the ritual with nary a patch of flesh showing. Some of the little ones shrieked in delight or terror or something and I think a peep might have escaped me too as they filtered back into camp and grabbed one of the finished torches to take to a place in the camp. Whenever everybody had a spot and a torch, I didn’t know who was who but I counted the bodies, some unspoken command must have gone out because, with what sounded like one voice, they all invoked at once and the torches about the camp sprang into blazing light.

The flash was nearly blinding in the gathering dark, or would have been if we hadn’t been prepared for it, and I caught myself thinking that it was a good thing we were three days out from any Silver Bones because so much magic would have drawn them down like flies to rotting meat. While all the Overfolk kids were still blinking around, we saw Yemtz, Kressle’s mast, the Teller, unfold his spindly limbs from one of the wagons and move, quickly for a man his age, to the center of camp. To anyone who had been caught by the flash of light, it would look like he appeared out of thin air. ‘Course he could have actually done it with magic, but something were about tradition and no one had known how to move something that big when this one started. From the collective gasps that went up from the Overfolk, it seemed like some people were still impressed by it.

Yemtz raised his hands for silence. When all was quiet save for the buzz of insects, he began “No one knows how long there was the darkness. In those days, no one knew anything. Sky was black as pitch and what lived on the land were small, dumb things that crawled in the gloom.

No one knows how long the gods had been travelling for either, or how many planes they walked across before they came to this one. They aren’t in the habit of sharing such things with the likes of mortals.

No one knows when the beginning was. It doesn’t matter. Thing started going when Feteikam, may we ever keep it guessing, chewed its way through the darkness. Now Feteikam filled the whole it’d made with light so that it could see what kind of plane it had come across and made the sun. Feteikam had to see because its purpose it to know and to catalog all that is across the great expanse of all that can. It set to work right away, spinning the worlds around the hole it made so it could look at all of them from all sides in the light it had made.

Then Zhotgef, may we never let it finish, chew its way through after its sibling. Zhotgief hated what it saw on this plane, as it had hated everything it had seen before, so it filled its hole with nothing and left it to suck up all the light and life that there was. When Feteikam turned its gaze away, there was Zhotgief to take back what its sibling had given and return things to stillness.

In this the siblings found balance and peace as that which was destroyed would not change and Feteikam could have knowledge while Zhotgief could have ignorance.

But there was a third sibling, Eikorot, who did not want this balance or this peace. It had grown tired of its sibling’s patterns, the dull planes which they surveyed then destroyed. It was bored. And a bored trickster god is a dangerous thing. Eikorot had been planning his prank since the true beginning and it was here, on this plane, that it pulled it.

Eikorot created life and laughed at its siblings’ confusion. Life always changed. It could not be cataloged, Feteikam would have to keep the planets spinning forever if it was to see all of it. And to stop Zhotgief from devouring them, Eikorot gave them fire that they might make their own light to fill the hungry darkness.

One by one, Eikorot made the peoples of the world and with each attempt its skill grew. And when it felt as if it had mastered the art of making life, Eikorot made us, its favored people. But you see it played a trick on us too because that is its nature. Eikorot made us best, yes, but it also made us last and all the other lands had been given out and we had no home. Eikorot made us slight and quick and few so that we could not take others lands by force. Eikorot made us in its own image, as much as that which is not alive could. It made us tricksters, just like itself, forced to survive by relaying on our wits and our families.

This burden is the gift of the gods upon us. Thus we hate them. And are grateful.”

A Brief History of the New Morgan Empire

Emerging from the Age of Smoking Dust came two great civilizations. One, whose name has been lost to history, sought to reclaim the glories of the fallen civilization and the other, the Empire of New Morgan, feared the mistakes of the past would once more lead to ruin. The New Morganites were led by a brilliant empress, born Sorenthai Mo’horgane. As a youth, Sorenthai discovered gunpowder and invented primitive firearms, tools which she used to conquer what is now known as Sotheslund before the age of fifteen. In reaction to reports that magic was once again being practiced in the north, Sorenthai designed and constructed a floating bridge so that her armies could cross the Sea of Brass and invade the other civilization which was budding there. Equipped with superior weaponry, military experience and dogmatic hatred, the New Morganites all but exterminated their foes, driving the refuges to the far north and south-east. Now in possession of the relatively fertile lands of Nomenslund, the New Morganite population exploded. A mass exodus from the deserts of Sotheslund occurred and the capitol of the New Morgan Empire shifted from the sunbaked mountains of Sorenthai’s childhood to the green shores of the Bay of Steam. Relatively unopposed in their new lands, the Morganites grew into a populous and sprawling empire with tendrils reaching into all corners of the Three Continents area.

Even after Sorenthai’s reign, the Mo’horgani Dynasty continued to be innovative and capable leaders. They made great leaps in technology including medicine, weaponry and transportation. Unfortunately, the Mo’horgani Dynasty’s legacy is not solely one of intellectual prowess and technological progress. Slavery, aggressive colonization and fear-mongering characterized the middle and late years of the Dynasty more than anything else. The great churning wheels of their industry were greased by the blood, sweat and tears of captured peoples from distant lands and gladiatorial combat was the primary entertainment of the nation’s gentry. Having subdued all foes at home, the Morganites took their wars overseas. Although they were among the first civilizations to recover, by the time they entered into their colonial periods, other cultures had begun to emerge on other continents. However, superior technology, larger forces and better training meant that few of these nascent unions could fight the Morganites and soon their empire had seats on every continent known to them and collected fortunes in tithe and tribute from around the world.

The call for endless progress which drove the Morganites meant the dual need for endless enemies and the Morganites had a historical antithesis that they could be assured to fight forever but never defeat: magic. Their national roots as a reaction to the devastation caused by the magical follies of the Proto-Cassandrites generated a dogmatic hatred and fear for the arcane and esoteric. Although magic on an empire building scale had become a thing of the past, the traditions in opposition to it remained. For the Morganites, witchcraft was comparable to treason and both carried a similarly harsh and final sentence. It is due in large part to the actions of the Morganites that magic on the surface was nearly eradicated. Many of the wars fought by the Empire were billed as crusades to halt the spread of witchcraft.

Under the aggressive, innovative leadership of the Mo’horgani Dynasty, the Empire experienced its largest amount of growth both territorially and technologically. However, the rule of the Morgans was not to last forever. For 312 years, they endured from their genesis with the first Empress Sorenthai to the last Emperor Kalem III. It is said that for each Morgan ruler, there was a new war. They were born and forged in conflict. And the dynasty ended the same way. In its day, the Empire was unquestionably the strongest military power of the surface world. Unsurprisingly, the Morganites considered themselves inherently superior to other people and the Mo’horani Dynasty itself took this ideology a step further, placing their status above that of their own people as well. Towards the latter days of the Empire, inbreeding within the royal line became rampant and devastating. In the last hundred years of their reign, the Mo’horgani began to exhibit unstable tendency. In their last fifty years, the Three Kalems Reign, this instability devolved into outright insanity as each successive child-emperor was madder than the last. The corruption of the throne became too much for the people to bear and a faction of the nobility which dubbed itself the Council of Martyrs successfully orchestrated a coup against the Mo’horgani Dynasty. The Council, backed by the First Mechanized Cohort, the first successful military use of exo-suits, used their political connections to infiltrate the Royal Estate and end the Mo’horgani line in a single night of slaughter.

Officially at least. Well known historical figures, most notably Frelleise Lepsidir who led the Industrialists during the Daylight Wars and believed herself to be the literal reincarnation of Sorenthai Mo’horgane and Joqo Tzene, council elect of the House of Bone and Silver, have often claimed blood ties to the Mo’horgani Dynasty. In the Successor States of Central Nomeslund, those who seem touch by both genius and madness are often said to be the Blood of Old Morgan, a designation which marks them with both fear and respect.

The Ideal Community

Many abuses that mankind has perpetrated upon itself over the course of history have been justified under the banner of Social Darwinism. I already had something of an idea about this before attending this class and was rather surprised to find that the definition of Social Darwinist I encountered here different from my previous understanding. I had believed it to be the concept that Europeans were more highly evolved than other “races” and thus had the duty to spread themselves, their culture, their technology, their government, their genetics all across the face of the world so as to better it. It was linked with Rudyard Kipling’s charming little ditties. I was very happy to decry this notion as not only morally dubious but scientifically laughable.

It was rather concerning to me to be present with a different model. From this class I gathered that a newer perception of Social Darwinism is simply the application of the theory of natural selection to cultural arenas. And that it was being attacked with the same ferocity as the blatant racism, stodgy apologist justification and backwards thinking as before made me feel profoundly uncomfortable.

Because I think that not only can the ideas of natural selection be applied to society, but I think that they should. I think that it is the fundamental building block of a functioning free capitalist society, which I have been led to believe is the best society. In my view, culture or society is a sort of ecosystem, a microcosm of the global where each unit of humanity is like a unique species in competition with all others. Although some rhetoric might define different phenotypes of units of humanity, the true unit of humanity is a single human. For me, the ideal society is one in which each human is allowed to prove themselves to be fit or not on their own merits and as little else as possible.

Like all aspiring dictators, I have a plan to bring this paradise about. It starts out simple, with a core concept that I am quite fond of: the abolishing of inheritance. We do not live in a functioning, free, capitalist society and it is because of the generational compounding of both power and powerlessness. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. You’ve got to have money to make money. There are those who have who did not earn, did nothing but sit back and collect on what they feel is owed them based on who contributed to their genetic material. I do not feel this should be encouraged. Money and power should come from innovation, drive and excellence alone. In my ideal community, all property returns to the state after an individual’s death. Material goods are auctioned off and financial means are confiscated.

Problems immediately arise from this measure. What if a parent gifts things their children while they are still living? This is, of course, illegal and careful records will be kept of who acquires what so that recollection may proceed smoothly. Another plus to this method is that it creates jobs. Other, more Lowry-esque, solutions to the issue of progeny include taking all children from their parents and having them raised either by surrogates or in orphanages. Although these have their upsides, the put a damper on one of the key human drives, to provide for one’s children, and I believe would ultimately be destructive. Doubtless, there would be large orphanages for children whose parents expire before they reach majority but they should not, ideally, be someone’s first stop.

Through these practices, the nurturing parental urge should shift in the majority to provide the tools for the child to achieve themselves rather than simply granting with them the fruits of one’s own success. Furthermore, for those whose lives appreciably depreciate after being separated from the possessions of their parents, it is my hope that they should yearn to recapture at least the same level of comfort and strive for achievement in their own lives.

From the confiscation and resale of property, the government should acquire a surplus of funds. These funds will be channeled back into the community in the form, primarily of scholarships and grants. These funds will be allocated on a basis of merit, determined by testing and observers within classrooms and other public spaces. Corruption of these observers should be punishable by death. The lynchpin of this society’s moral integrity is that those who can best use resources are those to whom resources are given. If this is compromised and those who judge merit could be bought or sold then there is nothing redeemable within this concept and it is fit only for dystopian science fiction.

Other than the function of collecting and reallocating funds, the role of the government should be limited peacekeeping and national defense. Ideally, these duties could be taken up by private companies for the most part however, in the instance of rogue elements, it will always be necessary to have a governmental military presence.

I see this society as, strange though it may seem, the epitome of equality. To riff off the quintessential quotation, “All men are created equal.” I agree with this sentiment wholeheartedly. In each person there is theoretically equal potential. However, I see this concept being abused ceaselessly in our society due to the simple misunderstanding that being equal at creation should ensure consistent equality. It is grossly fallacious to assume that equal opportunity should equate to equal results. Furthermore, I believe that it is the duty of none but the individual, and that individual alone, to determine the results which are the fruit of their opportunity. In its essence, my ideal community is simply an attempt to create equal opportunity in the belief that those who make the most of what they are given are those that should be given further opportunity to have more.

I also believe that, if I was ever given the opportunity to run my ideal community in real, non-idealized life, I would immediately run it into the ground.

The Grand Illusion

Old movie are different. Heck, everything old is different. That’s kind of an unavoidable fact. Cultures change, people change (or stay the same depending on who you ask) and technology changes. In the modern era, or at least the past couple hundreds of years, the most important of those three kinds of changes has been the technology. Things get more complicated at an exponent rate. The primary function of technology has historically been to provide a reduction in either time or labor. The time aspect means that people have more freedom and the labor aspect means that some people have nothing to do at all. To do in the traditional sense of subsistence farming. Unshackled from these necessities, they are free to make themselves useful by developing more technology.

All of this lofty conceptual work is often difficult to associate with real world examples. This theory does nothing to help contextualize things that are happening in this very moment. Still these are the sort of things that come to mind when considering the Grand Illusion. It occupies the space of being a sort of double period piece. It is an older film, considered quintessential of its time, which itself tries to reflect a period only a few years before but culturally and technologically very distinct.

What strikes me first about the Grand Illusion is the subject matter. It is billed as a war movie, but growing up my concept of war movies involves, frankly, more war. Saving Private Ryan, Black Hawk Down and even Rambo are what come to mind immediately. These movies are bloodbaths, especially when compared to the Grand Illusion in which the scene which is the hallmark of the modern WWI movie, the dogfight, occurs off screen and is treated without pomp or circumstance.

Part of me thinks that the culprit is technology. The means to recreate such scenes in a realistic way simply did not exist in that era. The development of CGI has made the impossible a routine spectacle on the silver screen. There are other pieces of technical inaccuracies which stand out in the Grand Illusions more charged scenes. The guns fired are categorically and completely without recoil, for instance, and no attempt at fake blood is made when de Boeldieu is shot. The first of these is exceptionally easy to fudge while the second presents only a little more challenge. And yet they were not done.

Rather than the prime mover for the film’s style being a lack of the capability to perform such cinematic feats, it then seems to be a more conscious, intentional choice on the part of those responsible for film and is then a matter of culture. Indeed, the themes tackled in the Grand Illusion are not the same as, or even similar to, those depicted in major, modern, mainstream movies. Perhaps these things were not shown or attempted because the poor facsimile would be immediately recognized as just that and cheapen the movie. If the intent of the movie was, as I believe it to be, an honest, perhaps honest-ish, portrayal of the experience of war then such things would break the audience’s immersion and empathy and were discarded.

This honesty is not absent from modern works, yet it honestly tells a different story. Saving Private Ryan is often hailed as an uncompromising attempt to depict the horrors of war, fully loaded with a shocking script and top of the line special effects. It plays on the emotions of audience, just as the Grand Illusion does but emotions much different. Is it because they depict different wars? Is the narrative of WWII so different from its predecessor? Was it our ability to create these images that changed us? If the technology had been available Renoir, would his masterpiece have been laced with thrilling explosions? To me it seems more likely that it is the culture that has shifted. Watching films like Ryan now, I cannot help but look at the special effects creating the images of war flashing on the screen before me and think of them as illusions.

Gluten Free

Every day it seems, someone else becomes gluten-free. It’s the new scapegoat of the era. Every magazine and health guru has their own spin on what exactly this little miscreant does to those who unthinkingly ingest this malignant menace.

Are you overweight? Don’t eat gluten. Feeling tired? Stop with all the gluten gluten. Wrinkles got you down? We both know it’s all that gluten you’re eating. Want to live another ten years. Easy. Eliminate the gluten from your diet.

It seems like we can blame everything dietary on that little… whatever it is and feel justified about it. Gluten-free options are popping up on menus across the nation. Products that never had any in the first place slap a gluten-free sticker on their packaging and see the sales rise by 3%. It’s a capitalist miracle. Or maybe its scare tactics. Or maybe it’s a big made up farce constructed by the Free Masons or the reptilians or whoever to drive the wheat farmers out of business.

But hopefully none of this comes across as a complaint of any sort. In fact, I’m thankful that I live in the era where awareness of gluten is becoming more and more prevalent. Like many people, I am gluten-free. Although, and in this I feel in the minority, I am not so by choice. I have a genetic condition that does not allow me to ingest the titular binding agent without rather unpleasant consequences to myself. If I had lived in the past generation, with virtually no awareness of what was the issue with me, I might have been far worse off.

In fact, there is simply no might about it. I know that I would have because, since Celiac Disease is a genetic condition, and therefore inherited, my mother suffered through that very situation herself and she is still profoundly affected by it to this day. The particular strain of the disease that we are infected, although that is far from the right term, with causes intense drowsiness, loss of focus and internal organ damage (although that one might have just been made up to keep an undisciplined young man away from the baguettes). For my mother, whenever she would eat she would become immensely tired to the point of non-functionality. Without knowing the specific agent responsible she came to associate all food with a loss of agency and avoided eating whenever possible.

As might be expected, this has not fostered in her a loving relationship with the fine art of cuisine, and I, of course, say this in the most loving possible manner. I have come to understand that no one cooks at home in my absence. Even as a child, when my brother and I were away for extended periods of time, my mother reported that she subsisted solely on avocado and microwaved chicken patties for months on end.

Once, I regarded this prospect with guilt and horror. Guilt in that it was a touchstone for how much I imagined the absence of her children affected her, perfect little angels that we were and horror at the sheer blandness of the meal. I once liked to think of myself as something of an aspiring chef and my moral outrage was grounded in this aspect of my identity. There was a white plastic trash bin that I would don before the mirror and pretend that it was a chef’s hat. To me, this monotony was the most serious of offenses.

Around the time I started high school, my mother got herself tested and discovered she was gluten intolerant. For my brother and me things didn’t change much. When my mother cooked, she made two meals one with gluten for us and one without for her. When I cooked, I made whatever I pleased without a second thought. This didn’t last long. Around Christmas of my freshman year of high school I found myself getting tired after dinner and going immediately to bed. For the first couple of days, I thought nothing of it. And even as the condition persisted and I connected the dots, I refused to accept the most likely explanation. I was resistant at first when my mother offered to make more of the gluten-free portion one night but eventually I caved in. And, of course, I felt better. But with that came the knowledge that I was diseased. That, on the most basic, protein-to-protein level, there was something off-center about my being.

And that kinda took the wind out of my sails on the whole cooking deal. Even though I had long since stopped wearing a waste bin, that moment was what really felt like the end. But looking back, I think I may have gained more than I lost. There is weight to all those magazines and gurus, I’m in far better shape than I have a right to be given my eating and exercise habits and I always have an excuse to leave places early. And the biggest plus perhaps, is that I’ve gained perspective. When I think about avocados and microwave chicken patties, now I feel something more akin to awe or comradery. There is something tenacious and resourceful about finding something that works and sticking with it no matter how distasteful it might seem, or in this case taste. And the unwavering dedication to such a regime is something that I struggle with to this day.

I feel jealous or maybe envious of people who are gluten-free by choice. Not only in that they can quit or cheat whenever they want but that they will never suffer the consequences for a slip of willpower. But then I remember that I too am gluten-free by choice, in a sense. There is no one forcing me to pander to my genetic coding. Sure, I never asked for this condition, but no one asks to be born at all yet we keep forcing it on one another. And, since I intend to be a father someday and potentially sire off-normal children, it is only fitting that I live through the challenges, such as they are, that I might some day pass on to them.

Examined Passage (404-405)

Wes Lanser

3 Apr, 2015

In Search of Lost Time

Examined Passage

At last the carriages were ordered. Mme Verdurin said to Swann: “Good-bye, then. We shall see you soon, I hope,” trying, by the friendliness of her manner and the constraint of her smile, to prevent him from                         noticing that she was not saying, as she would always have said hitherto: “Tomorrow, then, at Chatou, and at my house the day after.”

                M. and Mme Verdurin invited Forcheville into their carriage. Swann’s was drawn up behind it, and he waited for theirs to start before helping Odette into his.

                “Odette, we’ll take you,” said Mme Verdurin, “we’ve kept a little corner for you, beside M. de Forcheville.”

                “Yes, Madame,” said Odette meekly.

                “What! I thought I was to take you home,” cried Swann, flinging discretion to the wind, for the carriage door hung open, the seconds were running out, and he could not, in his present state, go home without her.

                “But Mme Verdruin has asked me…”

                “Come, you can quite well go home alone; we’ve left her with you quite often enough,” said Mme Verdurin.

                “But I had something important to say to Mme de Crecy.”

                “Very well, you can write it to her instead.”

                “Good-bye,” said Odette, holding out her hand.

                He tried hard to smile, but looked utterly dejected.

                “Did you see the airs Swann is pleased to put on with us?” Mme Verdurin asked her husband when they had reached home. “I was afraid he was going to eat me, simply because we offered to take Odette back. It’s                 positively indecent! Why doesn’t he say straight out that we keep a bawdy-house? I can’t conceive how Odette can stand such manners. He literally seems to be saying ‘You belong to me!’ I shall tell Odette exactly                 what I think about it all, and I hope she’ll have the sense to understand me.

                A moment later she added, inarticulate with rage: “No, but, don’t agree, the filthy creature…” unwittingly using, perhaps in obedience to the same obscure need to justify herself – like Francoise at Combray, when                   the chicken refused to die – the very words which the last convulsions of an inoffensive animal in its death throes wring from the peasant who is engaged in taking its life. (404-405)

The confrontations in Proust’s work are often physically subtle. The encounters, when reduced down to the events which actually transpire, are simple things. Yet Proust surrounds them with such labyrinthine twists of emotion that they cause tension and turmoil far in excess of what they might produce had they been penned in any other way. The multi-reflective nature of Proust, that it is the memoirs of a fictional narrative, and especially this section as it undoubtedly based off stories that the narrator had been told by another character, since they occurred either before the narrator was born or when he was quite young, serves this purpose. We are made privy to the emotional winding up of the characters, as if they were watches or clockwork, all their imaginings and fantasies are described with as much verisimilitude as anything else in the story. Indeed, questions on the nature of memory which Proust himself subtly poses make us wonder if these imaginings are not themselves just as reliable as the memories which the character has created.

In this passage, Mme Verdurin has Odette ride in their carriage to her home instead of going, as per usual, in the carriage of M. Swann. A rather placid matter, it seems by that description. Yet the text of the passage and the place it occupies within the deliberate flow of the story lend to it a grand importance and overburden it with emotional significance. Strong parallels with the kiss at Combray with which the novel opens echo back and forth within the text, creating a sort of self-referential feedback that is at once familiar to our own thought processes and strange to see so faithfully reconstructed upon the page. This is a point in Swann’s relationship with Odette that the strain becomes public, when attempts to ignore what can be described as nothing less that his obsession become pointless. It also marks a turning point in Swann’s relationships and place in society, where the company of Odette no longer welcomes him as one of the “faithful.”

The very opening lines, the “At last,” are preceded by Swann “anxiously counting the minutes” until he can be alone with Odette. This strongly harkens to the kiss and, indeed, many pages before, the narrator admits that perhaps Swann would be the only one to understand the importance he placed on that act. It is in this passage that we begin to see why. At the restaurant with Odette, which Swann once enjoyed immensely he now longs only for the event to end so that he may spend precious time alone with his beloved, time that he has grown accustomed to having, a habit that he relies upon for release he cannot find elsewhere.

More than that it has become his habit, and more than that he simply feels his relationship with Odette is stretching and straining like pulled taffy, Swann has real reason to want to speak with Odette. He wants, or perhaps needs, her to shed light upon why Verdurin had broken her own habit of explicitly inviting him to the next night’s events and perhaps to conspire with Odette so that they might spend the evening together anyways. Of course, he also aches to “lull to rest in her arms the anguish that tormented him.” The narrator chooses to describe Swann’s needs for Odette as nearly identical to his own for his mother’s affection when he was a child. We are left to wonder whether this is intentional on the part of the narrator, whether it is taken from something that Swann related to him directly or whether he imagined it based on his own limited, or perhaps comprehensive, understanding of the mechanics of helpless infatuation.

Here also is an excellent example of Proust’s use of the action of anticipation. There are no further details about the dinner after the point at which Swann realizes that he has not been invited to the next one. Instead, he plots and schemes until the carriages arrive and it is time to leave. It is little wonder that the Verdurin and Odette tire of such absent company yet his obsession with Odette and preoccupation with the future blinds him to this cause. Furthermore, Swann is frequently subject to ruminations on hidden meanings within the words of others. In the case of Odette, it is frequently how he catches her in lies. In this case, it is the implications of what is not said by Mme Verdurin. In other places in Proust, through his use of abrupt changes or interruptions amidst cerebral discourses, we get a sense that time may still be going on while these are the thoughts within the heads of characters at the time that the scene is taking place. It is not at all implausible to imagine a silently panicking Swann, sitting at dinner isolated by his imagined plots which he uses to desperately cling to the threads of a life which is slipping through his fingers.

Which makes his outburst when these plans are so unexpectedly unraveled all the more relatable. When Mme Verdurin offers to take Odette home and she “meekly” accepts, the rug is completely pulled out from under Swann. It is not that Swann is unprepared for her to prioritize others above him, indeed he nearly fetishizes it with his suspicions and his stalkings, but rather that he did not expect it to come in this way and it destabilizes that fantasy that he has built up for himself. Indeed, Swann’s coping mechanism seems to be based upon elaborate scenarios which he imagines before events which lend him, at least partially. That which he truly craves: control.

The unexpected loss of power which comes when he is undermined by Mme Verdurin’s offer is what causes him to “[fling] discretion to the wind.” In matters where he has time to prepare, even matters where he is motivated by uncontrollable jealous impulse, Swann has a history of displaying circumspection. Here it is destroy by the unexpected, and perhaps to the characters of Proust, un-expectable breach of the canon of habit upon which Swann constructs his scenarios. We see another example of his when Swann visits what he assumes to Odette’s window at night and selects which window to spy upon by the habit shared by he and Odette to be only window with lights still within at the late hour of their rendezvous. It is likely also this inflexibility that makes Swann unattractive to Odette, as she once exclaims how nice it is to see him some time other than the afternoon, which he had made a point to exclusively see her in. Interestingly, Swann immediately dismisses this as a falsehood.

As the present spirals away from the future that Swann constructed and the contingencies that he had prepared for, he becomes increasingly distressed. When Mme Verdurin rebukes his insistence that he be the one to accompany Odette home and continues to resist him, the best excuse he can come up with is “But I had something important to say to Mme de Crecy.” Which is perhaps the most transparent, overused excuse developed by mankind. In other scenarios, ones in which Swann has time to plan, his lies and excuses are elaborate and, he thinks, cunningly crafted. Even in scenarios of heightened emotion, such as when he believes he is about to catch Odette cheating on him, he takes comfort and even pleasure in having just the right thing to say. Indeed, nothing less should be expected from a man who spends so much of his time in consideration of the hidden meaning of words. That ‘I need to tell her something‘ is his response indicates that something terribly wrong with this situation for Swann.

Swann is crushed by this development. Not only is Odette prioritizing others over him but she is doing so in a way that he had not planned for. Furthermore, and this may not be at the forefront of Swann’s consciousness due to his obsession with Odette, the social circle that he chose over that of Prince and other high society figures is rejecting him. In fact, Verdurin is humiliating him in what, by the convoluted standards of Proust’s depiction of the quasi-aristocracy, is an exceptionally blunt, brutal manner. The next passage hammers upon that point. The conversation is, without doubt, one imagined, yet we are left in doubt as to the original author of the fantasy. It is most likely that Swann dreamt it up, as I believe he is want to do as he “returned home on foot through the Bois, talking to himself aloud, in a slightly artificial tone he used to adopt when enumerating the charms of the ‘little nucleus’ and extolling he magnanimity of the Verdurins” (406). Without doubt, the narrator has put a great deal of his own experience into this twice-fictitious exchange, as evidenced by his insertion of dialog from his own childhood. In my opinion, Swann was the author of the first section in which Mme Verdurin is coherent. It smacks of the mental tortures Swann is said to inflict upon himself. The second seems to me to be the narrator’s commentary on Swann’s relationship with Odette, added independently as it more closely resembles the allegories to which the narrator is more prone that Swann.

In this case, Swann, or perhaps his relationship with Odette is the chicken. It is a hapless creature unaware of its purpose in the scheme of things, just as Swann is unaware of Odette’s extensive and sordid romantic history. It flails against its inevitable fate, not comprehending that it really have expected his all along and, the informed hand forced to do the dirty work of destiny, curses it for its ignorance and stubborn resistance. The allegory is only dissimilar in that, in the end, this chicken acquits itself with a manner of victory.

Leaving Washingon

Turning Point

                When I tell people the story of my life, they usually respond with some variation on the following thought: “Wow, you’ve lived in a lot of places.” While it might be true that I have lived in more places than the average American my age, sentiment always makes me a little bit uncomfortable. Generally, I smile and I nod and tell them “Oh yes,” both out of a desire to be seen as a worldly traveler but also to spare them and myself the telling of an overly complicated tale. Because, even though I have lived in California, Guam, Hawaii, Washington, Connecticut, Vermont, Florida and visited more states and countries besides, I have done the vast majority of my travelling at the two extremes of the timeline of my life: when I was young and in the past few years. Most contradictory of all to this image of a veritable nomad is that the sedentary middle years of my life, fourteen of them, have been spent right here, in the state of Washington, just an hour up the road from where I live now.

I was too young to remember the first moves of my life, from what I am told was a hilltop house in San Francisco to an inland neighborhood in the United States Protectorate of Guam to a quiet cul-de-sac in Hawaii. My memories of coming to Washington are clearer but leaving Washington, for the second time, the summer of my junior year truly set the tone for years of my life to come. Although the road trip cross-country was harrowing, it was the leaving I will never forget.

The little duplex at Point View Place had made me sick. An acquired sensitivity to mold due to prolonged exposure, was what I told people. I didn’t explain the reality. The feeling of being squeezed inside, that something was terribly wrong and terribly alien inside of my body. I felt it in chest, as if it were packed not with meat and blood but with shards of glass. The bones of my hands and face and feet raced with fire, sharp unexpected pains which came and went seeming with no prompting but their own. More than pain, the idea that I had been invaded was revolting, horrific in that quintessential H. R. Geiger way.

The duplex had been a fallback, a solution to the problem of the Bad Years. My mother had sold the other house, down-sided for less work and less pay, to be closer to work and closer to life, out of the big house with the big yard on the small island (one in Washington, I had lived on big islands before that) and into this places. It was supposed to make things better for us. It was a sort of last-ditch attempted. Then that ditch flooded and we were forced to dig a new one.

It became real for me when we had our yard sale. All of our possessions, placed in the driveway, without even price tags attached. Foolishly, I had been deputized sales manager and, being naive and in pain with no prior experience in haggling, managed to be hoodwinked by every person who ventured down the hill into the long-ago landscaped but never maintained, semi-urban, semi-jungle tangle of our property. We couldn’t take it with us, none of things we had amassed in 14 years. If it couldn’t fit into two cars, it could not come. By the end of that day, we had ourselves, my mother and me, our animals, a large black dog and a small black bunny, and little else. By noon the next day, we drove off. I felt behind me the pain of my sickness and the hurt of all the other losses and minor tragedies a young man accrues. They had been building, a seemingly vast reservoir of resentment held back by the flimsy dam of necessity and proximity. It seemed to me that all that was good had drowned in there, by the time I was leaving I felt very little reason to stay. And as our cars pulled out of the driveway, I could almost picture that dam breaking and the wave cresting behind me. I heard it break and its great force rush towards me. In my blue Subaru, with a black rabbit beside me and my life’s artifacts behind, I imagined that I rode the surging tide.

And as we crossed the Narrows Bridge, I looked back at the city which had been my home and I said to myself, aloud because there was no one to hear, “I got out just in time.”